|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
By Usman Abdullahi Koli
Beyond zones, numbers, and elite negotiations, Bauchi politics is ultimately filtered through a deeper lens: identity, faith, and moral acceptance. This layer is rarely written into party constitutions, yet it often decides outcomes. Any serious assessment of 2027 must therefore confront the ethno-religious composition of the state and how it quietly shapes political legitimacy. It is within this sensitive space that Dr. Bala Maijama’a Wunti’s suitability becomes even clearer.
Bauchi’s diversity is real and enduring. Hausa-Fulani, Kanuri, Sayawa, Jarawa, Guddurawa, Ngas, Gerawa, and others coexist within a framework that prioritizes harmony over domination. Islam is predominant, yet Christianity holds strong roots in several communities. The balance has survived because leaders historically avoided sectarian bias. Candidates perceived as tilting excessively toward one faith or ethnic bloc often encounter resistance, not through open confrontation, but through silent withdrawal of support. Wunti’s public posture, marked by restraint and inclusiveness, aligns with this delicate equilibrium. He neither performs religion nor politicizes identity, a quality that reassures multiple blocs at once.
The urban–rural divide further sharpens this point. Urban centers like Bauchi town, Azare, Ningi, and Toro increasingly shape discourse among educated youth and professionals. Yet elections are still decided in villages and wards where influence flows through imams, pastors, district heads, and respected elders. Wunti’s engagement strategy fits this reality. He does not confuse online traction with grassroots acceptance. His consultations prioritize moral gatekeepers rather than digital applause, reflecting an understanding that legitimacy in Bauchi travels through trust networks, not timelines.
Economically, Bauchi lacks a dominant business oligarchy capable of capturing politics. Power here remains moral and institutional rather than commercial. Former civil servants, academics, religious scholars, and retired officers constitute the elite class. This environment disadvantages flamboyant spenders and advantages candidates with credibility. Wunti’s rise as a federal technocrat fits this structure. His appeal is not driven by wealth display but by perceived competence and discipline, attributes this elite class respects and quietly amplifies.
Then there are the “neither here nor there” local governments: Gamawa, Kirfi, Ningi, Dass, and Misau. These areas are less bound by ethnic loyalty and more responsive to character, timing, and perceived fairness. They are the true battlegrounds of Bauchi politics. Wunti’s neutrality positions him well here. He does not arrive as a zonal champion demanding loyalty but as a consensus figure open to persuasion. Such flexibility is often decisive in tight contests.
Religious and traditional leadership models further reinforce this pattern. In Bauchi, the process of choosing a governor subconsciously mirrors how communities assess imams, pastors, or emirs. Trustworthiness, humility, justice, and competence matter more than bravado. This cultural evaluation cuts across faiths. Wunti’s demeanor fits this moral template. He carries himself as a steward rather than a conqueror, a trait deeply resonant in a society where authority is expected to be calm, not theatrical.
Religious harmony, long preserved in the state, also functions as a political compass. Leaders are judged by their ability to sustain peace between faiths. Candidates who inflame sentiment, even unintentionally, pay a price. Wunti’s avoidance of sectarian rhetoric and his quiet engagement with both Muslim and Christian leaders reinforce his image as a unifier rather than a divider.
Behind the scenes, clerics and traditional rulers remain powerful arbiters. Their influence is subtle but decisive. History shows that their approval, or quiet disapproval, has shifted electoral margins. These endorsements are rarely transactional; they are rooted in perceived integrity. Wunti’s consistent respect for these institutions, without attempting to instrumentalize them, strengthens his standing. In Bauchi, respect earns more than money ever could.
All these threads converge into what might be called Bauchi’s unwritten leadership evaluation model, a blend of Islamic ethics, cultural norms, and political realism. It asks six silent questions of any aspirant: Is he competent? Is he just? Is he humble? Is he stable under pressure? Is he fair across communities? Does his presence calm or inflame? These criteria are applied instinctively, from palace courtyards to mosque pulpits. Wunti scores strongly because his life and career answer these questions without excessive explanation.
This is why his candidacy feels less like an imposition and more like an alignment. He fits into Bauchi’s emotional geography rather than trying to redraw it. He understands that geography gives the stage, demography supplies the actors, but tradition writes the script. His politics respects that script.
As Bauchi moves closer to 2027, the contest will test not just ambition but understanding. Those who misread the terrain may shout louder. Those who understand it will move quietly and steadily. In Bauchi where legitimacy is conferred, not claimed, leadership is less about who wants power and more about who the people can live with.
Measured against this deeper standard, Dr. Bala Maijama’a Wunti does not merely qualify. He resonates.
Koli can be reached at [email protected].
Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.