|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
By Sadiq Muhammed
The United States provides a relevant example due to similarities in population size, cultural diversity, and the political system, at least in theory.
Despite its vast resources, the United States has a policing system that prioritizes bringing security to local communities.
This local focus ensures that police officers are more personally connected to the people they serve, reducing the likelihood of disrespect or detachment.
The U.S. policing system consists of various layers, including local police departments, county sheriff’s offices, state troopers, and federal law enforcement agencies.
These agencies, totaling around 18,000, operate at different levels of government, from local, state to federal.
Concerns about potential abuse of power by governors are not unique to state police forces but also extend to federal law enforcement agencies.
Given Nigeria’s size, diversity, and social complexity, a single centralized policing system is insufficient. The country needs a more decentralized approach, possibly with 38 to 812 police agencies, including one for each state and local government area.
Establishing state and local police forces is crucial, as seen in the fact that national security is ultimately dependent on local security. Neglecting local security creates strategic vulnerabilities that hinder overall security.
A shift towards effective governance at local levels is necessary, recognizing that failures may occur but are less likely to be as widespread as those of a centralized system.
This perspective is not limited to the current government and does not advocate for the dismantling of the federal security structure but rather emphasizes the need to strengthen local security foundations.
Muhammed can be reached at [email protected]
Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.