Court affirms Naval Officer’s constitutional right to resign from service
National Industrial Court declares Navy’s refusal to accept resignation unlawful and voids restrictive provisions of Armed Forces regulations
The President of the National Industrial Court of Nigeria (NICN), sitting in Abuja, Hon. Justice B. B. Kanyip, has delivered a landmark judgment via SUIT NO. NICN/ABJ/112/2024 affirming that Lieutenant Commander (Dr.) AG Halilu, a former officer of the Nigerian Navy, possesses the constitutional right to voluntarily resign from public service.
In the judgment, Justice Kanyip criticized the Chief of the Naval Staff (CNS) and the Nigerian Navy for failing to act on Halilu’s resignation request, describing their conduct as unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the provisions of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).
The court held that Halilu’s resignation letter, dated 28 July 2023, became valid and effective upon its receipt by the Chief of the Naval Staff.
Lieutenant Commander (Dr.) Halilu, who enlisted in the Nigerian Navy in August 2012, tendered his resignation after completing about 12 years of distinguished and unblemished service.
Between November 2022 and January 2025, he submitted five separate letters of resignation, most of which were ignored, suppressed, or rejected by naval authorities. Despite acknowledging his final resignation, the Navy raised objections and failed to grant approval. However, the court upheld the first letter of resignation submitted by the claimant going by section 306 of the 1999 Constitution, meaning that the claimant could not have retired a second or third time.
The senior officer is widely regarded as one of the most intellectually accomplished military officers in the Nigerian Armed Forces. He holds a Doctorate in Wireless Sensor Networks and Data Telecommunications and five master’s degrees in various disciplines. He is also a member of several professional and academic bodies, both in Nigeria and abroad, and has numerous scholarly publications to his credit in the field of computing and information technology.
In his letters and submissions, Lieutenant Commander (Dr.) Halilu cited unfair and unjust treatment, discrimination, and persistent disregard for the rule of law within the system as key reasons for his decision to voluntarily exit the Nigerian Navy.
Represented by his counsel, M. A. Danmama, Esq., the claimant argued that the Nigerian Navy lacked the legal authority to deny his resignation, stressing that compelling him to remain in service amounted to forced labour, contrary to the provisions of the 1999 Constitution.The Chief of the Naval Staff and the Nigerian Navy appeared before the court through their legal representatives to defend the action.
In its well-considered ruling, the National Industrial Court nullified the provision of the Harmonized Terms and Conditions of Service (HTACOS) for officers of the Nigerian Armed Forces, which required officers who self-sponsored training courses to serve an additional five years before being allowed to resign. The court held that this provision was oppressive, disturbing, slavish, unconstitutional, and a gross violation of fundamental human rights.
Justice Kanyip reaffirmed the supremacy of the Constitution, declaring that its provisions have binding force on all persons and authorities throughout the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Accordingly, any law or regulation inconsistent with the Constitution — including portions of the HTACOS and the Armed Forces Act — was declared null and void to the extent of its inconsistency.
The court granted the following reliefs in favour of the claimant:That Lieutenant Commander (Dr.) AG Halilu has diligently served the Nigerian Navy for about 12 years and is constitutionally entitled to voluntarily exit the service.That his resignation letter dated 28 July 2023 is valid and effective.That Nigerian Navy Signals 787NG (dated 18 March 2025) and 983NG (dated 25 April 2025) declaring him absent without official leave (AWOL) were set aside (null and void). That the Nigerian Navy shall issue the claimant his Certificate of Service, Record of Service and Retired personnel ID Card.That the Nigerian Navy shall desist from any prejudicial or retaliatory actions against the officer in the future.
In conclusion, the court granted the reliefs sought by the claimant and declared his resignation from the Nigerian Navy valid and effective from the date the letter was received.
Reacting to the judgment, the claimant’s counsel, M. A. Danmama, Esq., commended the court for “reaffirming the jurisprudence of the National Industrial Court on the constitutional right of public officers to voluntarily resign,” describing the decision as “a well-researched and courageous judgment”.

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.